The numbers say inflation is 3.3%. That’s not the real story—and it never was.

Just a few months ago, inflation was reported at 2.4%, and we were told that meant things were stabilizing. The messaging was clear: the worst was behind us, the economy was settling down, and wages were starting to catch up. But for a lot of people, that didn’t match reality. Rent was still climbing. Grocery bills were still painful. Insurance premiums kept inching higher. The numbers said “progress,” but everyday life said something else entirely.

Now inflation has climbed to 3.3%, and suddenly the tone has shifted. What was once framed as “under control” is now something to watch more closely, something to explain, something to blame on global conflict and rising energy prices. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: the difference between 2.4% and 3.3% doesn’t actually explain why people feel like they’re falling behind. Because the problem was already there.

Inflation is an average. Your life is not.

When politicians and media outlets talk about inflation, they’re usually referring to a broad average—most often the Consumer Price Index (CPI). It tracks price changes across a wide range of goods and services and rolls them into a single number. That number is tidy. It’s easy to report. It sounds authoritative. It’s also deeply misleading when you try to apply it to real life.

No one’s budget is spread evenly across the entire CPI. People don’t spend a little bit on everything. They spend most of their money on a handful of unavoidable categories: housing, food, utilities, transportation, healthcare, childcare. These are the costs that define whether you’re getting by or falling behind. And they don’t rise in neat alignment with a national average.

Even when inflation was sitting at 2.4%, many of those essentials were increasing much faster. Now, at 3.3%, that pressure hasn’t suddenly appeared—it’s just harder to downplay. The average didn’t capture the strain then. It doesn’t capture it now.

The reality gap depends on your income

The impact of rising costs isn’t evenly distributed, and that’s where the average breaks down even further. Higher earners spend a smaller percentage of their income on essentials. When prices go up, they have options. They can cut back on discretionary spending, delay big purchases, or absorb increases without destabilizing their lives. Many also benefit from rising asset values—homes, investments—that can offset inflation. Lower-income households don’t have that cushion.

When most of your income already goes toward necessities, there’s no meaningful way to “adjust.” You’re already making the cheapest choices available. You’re already stretching every dollar. So when rent increases or groceries get more expensive, it’s not an inconvenience—it’s a disruption. This is why the same inflation rate can feel manageable to one person and overwhelming to another. The number is the same, but the lived experience couldn’t be more different.

---

---

The raise that looks good on paper

This disconnect shows up clearly in how raises are framed. For example, a 3.5% raise in a 3.3% inflation environment sounds like a win. On paper, it’s still a “real” increase. It suggests workers are keeping pace, maybe even getting ahead. But that logic only works if your actual expenses rise at the same rate as inflation. They don’t.

If your rent jumps 8% and your grocery bill climbs 5%, your personal cost of living is rising much faster than 3.3%. In that context, a 3.5% raise isn’t progress—it’s barely holding the line, if that. And the difference becomes even more stark when you look at real dollars. A percentage raise isn’t experienced as a percentage—it’s experienced as what that money can actually cover.

• A worker earning $15/hour gains about $1,092 a year from a 3.5% raise—roughly $91 a month
• A worker earning $75,000 gains about $2,625 a year—around $219 a month

That gap matters. For the lower-income worker, $91 a month might disappear the moment rent increases. For the higher-income worker, $219 can absorb rising costs with some flexibility left over. Same percentage. Completely different outcome.

Why the messaging feels dishonest

When politicians point to a number like 2.4% or 3.3% and say inflation is “low” or “manageable,” they’re relying on a technical truth that doesn’t translate into lived reality. The number itself isn’t fabricated. But the way it’s used—the conclusions drawn from it—often gloss over how unevenly price increases are felt.

It also doesn’t help that many of the economic indicators we’re told to watch—like the stock market—reflect how wealth is performing, not how people are coping. A strong market can coexist with rising rents and unaffordable groceries because those are measuring entirely different things.

So when the messaging says things are improving, but daily life keeps getting more expensive, people don’t just feel confused—they feel dismissed.

The metric we’re not talking about

What’s missing from the conversation is a widely recognized measure of true living costs—one that isolates essential expenses and tracks how they’re changing relative to income. Because that’s the number people are actually living with.

We have the data to build that kind of index. We can track rent increases, food prices, utility costs, healthcare expenses. We can compare those directly to wage growth. But that’s not the number that leads the headlines.

And it’s not hard to see why. A metric focused on essential costs would likely show a much wider gap between income and expenses, especially for lower- and middle-income households. It would make it harder to point to a single, reassuring percentage and declare success. It would tell a more complicated—and less comfortable—story.

The bottom line

The jump from 2.4% to 3.3% didn’t create the problem. It just made it more visible. Because the real issue isn’t whether inflation is “low” or “high” by official standards. It’s whether the costs people can’t avoid are rising faster than what they earn. And for a lot of Americans, they are.

Until we start measuring that reality—and talking about it honestly—the numbers will keep sounding better than life feels. And people will keep being told they’re doing fine, even when they know they’re not.

Now available in print and on Kindle!

Now that Jack has been forced to reflect on everything he has to lose, he resolves to do better. He’s determined to spend more time at home with his family and repair the relationships that have suffered over the years while he’s been so focused on work. But as Callie’s behavior becomes increasingly bizarre, Jack realizes he has a lot more room to improve than he realized – and it might be too late to save his daughter after all.

For fans of We Need to Talk About Kevin, The Push, and Baby Teeth.