The Hill by Harriet Clark: A searching, unsettling novel about who gets to have a life

What if your life never quite begins—because you’ve been living inside someone else’s choices from the very start?

The Hill by Harriet Clark (releasing May 5, 2026) is the kind of novel that circles its questions rather than answering them outright, returning again and again to the same emotional terrain: what makes a life a life, and who gets to claim one. Through Suzanna Klein—whose mother is serving a life sentence in a hilltop prison for a failed act of radicalism—Clark builds a story that is at once intimate and expansive, tracing the quiet, often invisible ways generations shape one another.

From childhood, Suzanna’s world is split cleanly in two. There is the prison, where Saturdays feel almost ceremonial, filled with children dressed as if for a party, and where life and death exist side by side in the form of a nursery and a cemetery. And then there is home, where she is raised by a grandmother who refuses to visit her own daughter and instead surrounds Suzanna with a rotating cast of elderly women—friends, acquaintances, and relics of a political past that still hums beneath their conversations. These women, many of them shaped by histories they rarely name outright, spend their days debating ideology and their nights quietly reckoning with the lives they did and didn’t live.

It’s within this tension that The Hill finds its emotional core. Suzanna grows up watching people age, reflecting not only on what has been lost but on what was never chosen in the first place. One of the novel’s most striking throughlines is the question posed by one of these women: when does Suzanna’s life actually begin? Is it something she must claim for herself, or something her elders were supposed to secure for her?

Clark doesn’t offer easy answers. Instead, she presents Suzanna as a character content—at least on the surface—to remain exactly where she is: living with her grandmother, visiting her mother, and continuing a routine that feels both stable and quietly suffocating. Around her, everyone else has an opinion on what her life should look like, particularly the women who see in Suzanna the possibility of a different ending than their own. That generational frustration—watching someone younger fail to seize opportunities you never had—is rendered with a sharp, almost uncomfortable clarity.

The novel also explores the cost of motherhood in a way that feels particularly grounded in lived experience. Suzanna’s grandmother is perhaps the most compelling embodiment of this theme: a woman who clearly loves her granddaughter, yet carries a palpable regret about the choices that led her here. Having already raised a daughter whose actions fractured the family, she now finds herself responsible for another generation, all while insisting that Suzanna must not repeat the same mistakes. It’s a dynamic that feels painfully real—the push and pull between love, obligation, and the lingering question of what might have been.

---

---

Layered beneath all of this is a quieter but persistent historical weight. Many of the women in Suzanna’s life are Jewish, and while the Holocaust is rarely addressed directly, its shadow is unmistakable. It lingers in their silences, in their losses, and in their preoccupation with survival, legacy, and meaning. The result is a novel that understands how history doesn’t just live in the past—it echoes forward, shaping the emotional landscapes of generations who may not fully understand its origins.

Where The Hill occasionally falters is in its execution. The storytelling can feel rough, at times circling back on itself in ways that verge on redundancy. There are moments where the narrative drifts into tangents that don’t quite cohere, giving the book a disjointed quality that feels less like a deliberate stylistic choice and more like a lack of refinement. With tighter editing, the novel’s ideas might have landed with greater clarity and impact.

Still, even in its unevenness, The Hill remains a deeply thoughtful and often moving work. Clark is clearly reaching for something ambitious here, and while the structure doesn’t always support the weight of those ideas, the questions at the heart of the novel linger long after the final page. It’s a book that invites reflection more than resolution, asking readers to consider not just the lives its characters have lived, but the lives they might have lived—and what it really means to choose differently.

If you’ve read The Hill, I’d love to hear your thoughts—did the novel’s big questions resonate with you, or did the storytelling pull you out of it? Let’s talk in the comments.

An advance reader copy of this book (ARC) was provided to me by the publisher via Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.

Related Content

• Time is a bandit in Harriet Clarke’s new novel, The Hill (Harper’s Bazaar)
• What do you do when a family member commits a terrible crime? (The New York Times)
• Descent by Harriet Clark (The Paris Review)

Now available in print and on Kindle!

Now that Jack has been forced to reflect on everything he has to lose, he resolves to do better. He’s determined to spend more time at home with his family and repair the relationships that have suffered over the years while he’s been so focused on work. But as Callie’s behavior becomes increasingly bizarre, Jack realizes he has a lot more room to improve than he realized – and it might be too late to save his daughter after all.

For fans of We Need to Talk About Kevin, The Push, and Baby Teeth.